Let’s make the grimy architecture of the web visible again

The Internet Development Market

You will recall TinyURL, or bit.ly. You will have noticed t.co around Twitter. They are used, of course, for shortening, but also for monitoring and measurement and since they obscure the destination, they create malicious object more feasible. I guess they are also impacting the psychogeography; the infrastructure gets less noticeable, the floor feels less strong. And newer generations of browsers on our telephones are making this worse; concealing URLs and shepherding us through the net without letting us see it as we are the Queen being directed through a construction site by means of a tunnel of velvet curtains. And, for a little while, domains and URLs became a part of the pleasure of the internet. While the commercial elements of city got excited about the cash changing hands for cars.com, the bohemian quarters were producing baroque structures like del.icio.us or mucking around with ridiculously domain names. I really don’t think I have ever been as excited as if I realised I might purchase agoodplaceforacupofteaandathink.com. Certainly, I thought, this should happen to be snapped up. If you are the specific sort of pretentious arse I’m you’ll have flirted with readings regarding psychogeography. And you’ll have entertained the thought that something in the bodily form of buildings along with the topography of town may influence your mood. Uniform Resource Locators — net addresses to most people — would be the nearest the ordinary online user gets to feeling the physical infrastructure of the net. Experienced web developers will appear at a URL arrangement and draw conclusions concerning the soundness of a website’s structure, in precisely the exact same manner a structural engineer might look at a bridge, but I feel that the rest of us feel something there also, even without understanding exactly what is happening. Why the net’s been feeling flakier of late, since our URLs have been glued over with Favorable facades? I thought about URLs when studying suck.com – the first webziney thing that initiated numerous online writing styles. They had been the first to utilize links and URLs as jokes and meta-commentary and portion of their writing, not as footnotes. When ranting about the commercialisation of the internet, for example, they’d link to their own own website and admit and defuse their own hypocrisy. This style became common internet currency; weaving structure closely in with articles and getting another portion of the net’s psychogeography, such a website which enjoins one to ‘click’ (‘click’) merely appears not as professional, like you are at a shoddily made construction. It is increasingly clear that a digitally literate citizenry will be beneficial for a thousand distinct reasons. A fantastic way to start is to create URLs observable again, to allow folks see the infrastructure they are residing in. Maybe it is time to get a few pro-URL sloganising: Under The Shorteners, The internet!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar